Busch-Jaeger en puls 07 - bei Flipedia.

Busch-Jaeger en puls 07

44 Seiten, bei Flipedia.

Movements in architecture 02 | 2010 Zero energy house surPlushome By Manfred Hegger Networking und automation ­ intelligent buildings Quo vadis, sustainability? Ecological concepts ­ visiting Behnisch Architekten » Editorial Architect Werner Sobek has never considered architecture that is aesthetically pleasing yet consistently sustainable to be a contradiction in terms. To the point: sustainability & aesthetics pulse in conversation with Werner Sobek Christoph Reichelt Your great passion is architecture that does not require outside energy inputs. What motivates you to pursue this objective so rigorously? Quite simply the realization that we cannot go on building as we have been doing. We use the most valuable raw materials such as crude oil or coal to produce energy rather than preserving them to manufacture high-quality plastics. The emissions created in producing that energy are also the reason for global warming, the third greatest ecological problem we face today. This is why it is vital for us to achieve an architecture that manages without fossil fuels (both for production and operation) and which can as far as possible be recycled. Energy efficiency has become the key word of the 21st century. Where do you personally see the greatest energy savings potential in architecture? First of all in reducing "gray" or "embodied" energy, in other words the energy required to extract raw materials, manufacture base products and half-finished products, but also all the associated transport and assembly processes. The second greatest energy-saving potential lies in the more consistent use of the solar energy that shines on our buildings. The third greatest savings potential lies in managing the energy inside our buildings. With your R 128 house, you have proven that it is feasible for energy-efficient buildings to also satisfy the most exacting architectural standards. The sole purpose of my work is to create beauty. This is inextricably linked to achieving a high standard of functionality and sustainability, whereby the latter means we must be proficient in advanced technologies. Architec- ture whose aesthetics are about renouncing pleasure will never find its way into people's hearts and will not be accepted à la longue. No, sustainable architecture must be breathtakingly beautiful! Energy efficiency will most certainly shape our lives, but can evolution manage to keep pace with this radical change you are seeking? I think so, yes. Given the changes that the various societies on Earth have undergone in the last 20-30 years and that they will undergo in the coming decades, such a step, radical as it is, towards a sustainable architecture with a high-grade design is still the easiest way to master the problem. And it can be realized precisely because you can communicate its necessity to everyone. 02 pulse 02 | 2010 Quo vadis, sustainability? ­ in search of a new building style > p. 04 Winning series with zero e...

Bitte aktivieren Sie die Javascript Unterstützung Ihres Browsers, um diesen Katalog zu nutzen.